Why Sales Doesn't Use the Content You Build (And Whose Fault It Really Is)

News From MHQ to You 📰

The VP of Sales came to our quarterly planning meeting with a list:

"We need case studies for manufacturing. Competitive battle cards. ROI calculators. Product explainers. One-pagers for each persona."

I said yes. Marketing spent six weeks building exactly what sales asked for…polished, on-brand, technically accurate, delivered on time.

Three months later, I checked our content management system.

Downloads: 14
Shares: 3
Actual usage in deals: Maybe 2

When I asked the VP of Sales if the case studies were helping, he said: "Oh, I didn't know we had those." Another rep said, "I just use my own deck." Another: "That stuff's too technical for my buyers."

Marketing built exactly what sales requested. Sales didn't use it. Why? Because it didn't match how they actually sell. And here's the uncomfortable truth: this is usually a marketing leadership problem, not a sales problem.

The Content Service Desk Problem

Most marketing teams operate like a content service desk:

Sales submits requests.

Marketing produces them.

Everyone checks the box and moves on.

Two months later, you check Highspot or Seismic:

Zero downloads. Zero shares. Zero usage.

Sales says: "Marketing's content isn't helpful."
Marketing says: "Sales doesn't know what they need."

The real issue is simpler: Marketing keeps saying yes to poorly defined requests.

Sales: "We need more content."
Marketing: "For what deal? Which customer asked for it? What objection does it handle?"
Sales: "Just… in general."
Marketing: yes.

That leadership failure costs more than time and budget. It costs opportunity.

The same six weeks could have been spent on:

• Fixing messaging that hurts conversion rates.

• Launching a high-value demand gen campaign.

• Building enablement sales would actually use in live deals.

Every time marketing says yes to vague requests, we say no to work that actually moves the needle.

The Pattern Most Companies Follow

Q1: Sales says they need better content. Marketing builds it.
Q2: Leadership asks why adoption is under 10%. Marketing blames sales.
Q3: Sales says content isn't relevant. Marketing builds more.
Q4: Pipeline is down. Leadership blames marketing.

The cycle repeats because no one asks:

What problem is this content supposed to solve?

Not: "What type of content do you want?"

But:

• What deal is it meant to help close?

• What objection does it address?

• How will sales actually use it in a conversation?

If those answers aren't clear, the content won't get used, no matter how good it is.

What Great Marketing Leaders Do Differently

They don't just accept requests, they define problems.

When sales says, "We need more content," they ask three questions:

1. What deal is this meant to help close?
   Specific deals. Specific customers. If sales can't name it, the request isn't ready.

2. What objection does it address?
   What is the buyer actually resisting? "Just general objections" isn't enough.

3. How will sales actually use it in a conversation?
   When? Where? Email, call, live presentation? "They'll figure it out" = content won't be used.

If these three questions aren't answered, the response shouldn't be "yes." It should be:

"Come back when you can answer these."

The Content Adoption Test

Check your top 20 pieces of sales content. Look at usage:

• Under 20% usage: Marketing built it without sales defining the problem.

• 20–40% usage: Sales reviewed it but didn't shape it; some find it useful, most ignore it.

• 60%+ usage: Sales helped define the problem before marketing built it. Everyone knows when and how to use it.

Most B2B marketing teams have 40+ pieces of content with 5–15% adoption.
High-performing teams have 10–15 core pieces with 60–80% adoption because sales helped define the problem before building anything.

How to Track Content Usage

If you're using a sales enablement platform (Highspot, Seismic, Guru, Showpad), usage data is usually in the analytics dashboard. Look for:

Views/Downloads - How many times content was accessed
Shares - How many times it was sent to prospects
Engagement - How long prospects spent with it
Deal attribution - Which deals used which content

If you're not using an enablement platform, you can track manually:

Ask sales directly - "Which of these materials did you use this quarter?"
Enforce/Check CRM notes - Make mandatory fields in CRM records. Search for references to specific content in opportunity notes
Survey after wins/losses - "What content helped (or didn't help) in this deal?"

Most teams discover they're tracking creation obsessively (how many pieces we published) but usage barely at all (whether anyone actually used them).

If you don't know your current usage rate, that's the first problem to fix.

How to Start Fixing This

Stop accepting requests via Slack or email.
Use a 30-minute intake process with Marketing + Sales (+ Sales Enablement if relevant). Walk through the three questions and document answers before building anything.

Pilot one high-value asset.
Apply the three-question framework. If sales can answer all three, build collaboratively and track usage obsessively.

Tie content to deals, not downloads.
Stop measuring views or downloads. Start measuring:

• % of deals where content was used

• Stage where it was deployed

• Win rate of deals that used it vs. didn't

Make sales accountable for adoption.
If they request content, they own the usage target. "We need case studies" = "We commit to using these in 50% of enterprise deals this quarter." If they don't hit it, diagnose before building more.

When Marketing Really Is the Problem

Every time marketing accepts responsibility for problems it doesn’t control, two things happen.

First, companies waste time and money fixing the wrong things.

More campaigns.
More content.
More leads.

None of which solve the real problem.

Second, the real issues never get fixed.

Sales processes stay broken.
ICP stays unclear.
Product-market fit stays weak.

Because leadership believes marketing can solve it.

What Marketing Leadership Actually Means

Sometimes content truly is bad. Marketing owns it when:

• Messaging doesn't resonate

• Content is too technical or jargon-heavy

• Materials don't match the buyer journey

• Assets are hard to find or use

But when sales doesn't use what you build, the failure is problem definition, not content quality. Marketing leaders can't fix this by building more content. They fix it by clarifying the problem before building anything.

The Bottom Line

Content adoption doesn't fail because of bad content. It fails because:

Marketing said yes to the wrong problem

Marketing said yes before the problem was defined

Great marketing leaders don't operate content service desks. They solve problems…and you can't solve a problem you haven't defined.

Next time sales says, "We need more content," ask:

"Do they need content? Or do they need help defining the problem they're trying to solve?"

Most of the time, it's the second one.

If You're Navigating This

If this resonates, you're not alone. Marketing leaders everywhere try to support sales without becoming a content factory. That’s exactly why MarketingHQ exists. It’s a community for marketing leaders who want to think, and operate, like executives.

Join the conversation and learn what's working for others: MarketingHQ community. Inside the community, you’ll also get:

• Private chat groups with peers and industry experts (free for a limited time 🎁)

• Exclusive insights and hands-on support

• Member-only events and roundtables

And more…all for less than a weekly coffee habit ☕ 

Career Up 🚀

Let’s Get You Hired!

Chief Marketing Officer at Colliers Engineering & Design ($200,000 - $280,000)

Chief Marketing Officer at VHERNIER USA, LLC

Chief Marketing Officer at Marsh ($178,600 - $312,500)

VP Marketing at BNY

VP, Marketing & Sales Leader at Chubb ($155,400 - $264,200)

VP Product Marketing at MetLife ($238,800 - $318,300)

Partnerships Marketing Manager at Google ($142,000 - $205,000)

Principal Product Marketer at Amazon ($153,000 - $252,900)

Digital Growth & AI Strategy Marketing Manager at MariaDB ($130,000 - $150,000)

Marketing Manager at AeroVironment, Inc. ($133,630 - $189,420)

Demand Marketing Manager at Workday ($109,200 - $163,800)

Principal Marketing Manager at Intuit ($197,000 - $266,500)

Integrated Marketing Manager at roblox ($191,340 - $234,390)

Digital Marketing Creators at Nike ($102,800 - $210,000)

Marketing Manager at AltaMed Health Services Corporation ($103,816 - $129,770)

Designer, Events and Marketing at The New York Times ($85,000 - $100,000)

Find many more roles on our MarketingHQ Job Board 

If this email was forwarded to you, sign up here to get our weekly newsletter directly in your inbox.

UPCOMING EVENT

Join me in Boston for Bob Cargill's Marketing Road Show: The Business of Being Human.

I'll be speaking on a panel alongside marketing leaders from across New England, discussing how to build authentic marketing in an AI-driven world.

MarketingHQ is proud to sponsor this event, which brings together marketing executives, founders, and practitioners for real conversations about the work—not just the tactics.

Event Details:

• Date: Friday, Apr 10

• Location: Boston, MA

• Topic: The Business of Being Human

Register here: Marketing Road Show

If you're in the Boston area, I'd love to see you there.

- The MHQ Team