Marketing News & Hot Jobs Below 📰
Early in my career at IBM, I learned an expensive lesson.
There was a long backlog of content requests from sales. Nobody owned it. It had become a hot potato passed from person to person.
I was new. So I volunteered to clear it.
For weeks, my team worked through request after request. The backlog shrank. Requests got delivered. It felt like a huge win.
Then I checked the usage.
Most of the content was barely used. Some of it never got used at all.
Not because it was bad. Because it had been built for one conversation. One prospect. One opportunity.
Not for repeatable use across the business.
That was the moment it clicked.
We weren't building assets. We were processing requests.
Most Companies Think Marketing's Job Is to Create Content
It's not.
Content is one piece of marketing. An important one. But it isn't marketing.
When creating content becomes the strategy, you get a predictable pattern:
A sales rep asks for a one-pager
Marketing builds it It gets used once
Everyone moves on to the next request
On paper, marketing looks productive. The calendar is full. The team is busy. Assets are shipping.
In reality, it's just staying busy.
The Hidden Cost of a "Quick" Request
Every piece of content carries a cost.
Writing
Design
Reviews
Distribution
And the one nobody counts: opportunity cost.
Every one-off built for a single conversation is time that didn't go toward something repeatable. Something that could have supported dozens of deals instead of one.
In regulated industries, the cost is even steeper. Every one-off asset doesn't just cost production time. It costs another trip through legal or regulatory review.
The work feels like progress because something got delivered. But delivery isn't the same as impact.
The Better Question
The best marketing teams don't ask, "What content should we create?"
They ask a different set of questions before anything gets built:
Will this be used repeatedly?
Does it support a core buying conversation?
Can sales use it across dozens of opportunities?
Will it actually influence pipeline?
If the answer to those is no, you're not making an investment. You're filling a request.
Both can be valid. A real, qualified opportunity sometimes justifies a fully custom asset. That's smart resource allocation.
But most one-off requests aren't tied to a real deal. They're built for a moment that never comes. Something a rep thought they might need, or a reaction to a single comment on one call.
We wouldn't build a new product feature every time one prospect asked for something on a discovery call. Content deserves the same rigor.
The Real Fix Isn't More Discipline
The signal for what's worth building isn't the request. It's the pattern.
The objection you hear over and over. The question that comes up in every deal. The competitor that keeps surfacing.
When the same conversation keeps repeating, that's where the leverage is. Build the understanding once, then use it across every version of that conversation.
That's the difference between an asset and a request. An asset compounds. A request expires the moment it's used.
Most companies don't have a content problem. They have a prioritization problem. They confuse request fulfillment with marketing strategy.
Those aren't the same thing.
One of the most common frustrations inside MHQ is marketing leaders buried in one-off requests, knowing the work isn't compounding but unable to break the cycle.
The fix isn't a better content calendar. It's changing how the organization decides what gets built in the first place. That's hard to do alone, and it's exactly the kind of problem worth working through with people who've solved it.
Join the conversation and learn what's working for others: MarketingHQ community. Inside the community, you’ll also get:
Private chat groups with peers and industry experts (free for a limited time 🎁)
Exclusive insights and hands-on support
Member-only events and roundtables
And more…all for less than a weekly coffee habit ☕
Career Up 🚀
Now Let’s Get You Hired!
Chief Marketing Officer at Stealth Startup
Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) at Solar Mason
Senior Vice President of Marketing at Precision AQ ($240,000 - $360,000)
Chief Marketing Officer at Onda
VP - Head of B2B Marketing at Dow Jones ($250,000 - $285,000)
Head of Business Marketing at Fidelity Investments ($185,000 - $400,000)
Marketing VP at Twin Peaks
Vice President, Strategic Events, Experiences & Customer Marketing at Okta ($305,000 - $419,000)
VP Digital Marketing at SS&C Technologies ($140,000 - $190,000)
Vice President, Marketing at Watchmaker Genomics ($200,000 - $250,000)
VP, Growth & Segment Marketing at Prudential ($178,600 - $267,800)
Vice President, Growth Marketing at Midi Health ($250,000 - $300,000)
Product Marketing Director at Veeam Software ($171,800 - $440,200)
Director, Product Marketing at Synack ($180,000 - $230,000)
Sr. Event Marketing Manager at Gong ($138,000 - $210,000)
Senior Product Marketing Manager at Zendesk ($183,000 - $275,000)
Senior Product Marketing Manager - AI Protect at Zscaler ($171,500 - $235,000)
Senior Product Marketing Manager at F5 ($137,600 - $206,400)
Senior Product Marketing Manager at Abnormal Security ($153,000 - $220,000)
Marketing Events Manager at Behavox
Find many more roles on our MarketingHQ Job Board
Stop typing what you could say in 10 seconds.
Wispr Flow turns your voice into clean, professional text inside any app. Emails, Slack, client updates — speak once, send without editing. 4x faster than typing.
If this email was forwarded to you, sign up here to get our weekly newsletter directly in your inbox.




