The single biggest factor in whether your next marketing role works out has almost nothing to do with marketing. It's whether the company has product-market fit before you walk in.

I've joined companies that had it and companies that didn't, and the two jobs have almost nothing in common. When the fit is real, you're figuring out how to capture and scale demand for something the market already wants. When it isn't, you're trying to work out whether enough of the market wants it at all. Both can be good jobs. The trouble starts when you take the second one and everybody in the building thinks you were hired for the first. That's when you get handed a growth number built on the assumption that fit already exists, and you're expected to conjure the demand that's missing. When it doesn't show up, the story writes itself: marketing isn't working.

So before you sign anything, figure out which job you're actually taking.

Here's the part most people skip past. Everyone treats product-market fit as a product question, does the thing work, do people want it. But fit has a market side too, and that's where marketing has a huge role to play. You can have a product the market genuinely wants and still stall out, because nobody understands what you are, who it's for, or why it should matter to them. That's not a product failure. That's a positioning failure wearing a product failure's clothes, and it's the most common thing I see mistaken for "no PMF."

Which means there are really two different ways this goes wrong, and they call for opposite responses. One is no product fit: the thing itself doesn't solve a real problem well enough to make people change what they're doing. No campaign fixes that. Pour budget on it and you just reach the same wall faster and more expensively. The other is no market-side fit: the product works, but the story around it is muddy. That one marketing can actually fix, and it's often the difference between a company that looks dead and a company that was one clear sentence away from traction.

Knowing which of the two you're walking into changes what the marketing job actually is.

Founders will tell you they have product-market fit, and most of them believe it. That doesn't make them right, and pressure-testing it is your job during the interview, not theirs.

Start with retention instead of acquisition. Getting customers is one problem; keeping them is a completely different one, and it's the one that tells you the truth. Ask about net revenue retention, logo churn, expansion, whether the early customers are still around, and how those numbers have moved over the last couple of quarters. You're not just trying to figure out whether they found fit. You want to know whether it's getting stronger or starting to erode.

Then look for pull, the demand that shows up without the company forcing it into existence. Referrals, word of mouth, inbound, prospects who keep arriving with the same problem already half-articulated. Ask where the last handful of deals actually came from and how hard each one was to create. If every dollar of pipeline has to be manufactured by hand, I'd want to know why before I signed on to manufacture more of it.

Look for a buyer the company can repeat. Do they keep closing the same kind of customer for roughly the same reason, or is every win a different logo with a different use case and a different story about why they bought? Scattered wins can look a lot like traction from the outside without telling you whether there's a market underneath that you can sell into again and again.

And the old Sean Ellis test still earns its keep: would customers be genuinely disappointed if the product went away tomorrow? You don't need a formal survey to feel the answer. You need evidence that losing the thing would actually hurt somebody. None of these proves fit on its own. You're reading for a pattern, and once you can see the pattern, you can see the job.

And ask who is actually going to do the work. A pre-PMF marketing job is already heavy on customer research, positioning, ICP work, testing and learning. If you're also expected to personally execute every campaign, write every piece of content and run every system, that's a different job again. “You'll build the team later” is fine, but I'd want to know what later means and what has to happen before I can hire.

Nothing wrong with joining a pre-PMF company. Some of the best startup opportunities look exactly like that. But you have to know what you signed up for, and the founders have to know it too, because the trouble almost always starts with the number.

You'll usually inherit a revenue or pipeline target that assumes fit already exists. Work backward from it using the company's real ACV, win rate, sales cycle, and current pipeline, and the math tends to come apart in your hands. That's why I think every incoming marketing leader should rebuild the number before agreeing to own it, and not after the first quarter misses.

But rebuilding the number isn't enough. You also have to reset what success looks like. If the real job is helping the company find fit, you can't spend six months tightening the ICP, fixing positioning, learning why customers buy and getting the company closer to something repeatable, then still be evaluated against the growth target that assumed all of that already existed.

The assignment changed, so the scorecard has to change with it.

The second trap is the belief that more marketing will close the gap. When growth stalls, the reflex is more of everything, more campaigns, more content, more spend, more events, more outbound. Sometimes that's genuinely what's needed. But marketing can't create lasting demand for a product the market hasn't decided it wants. More spend might help you find that out faster, which is useful, but it's a very different thing from building fit.

And eventually somebody has to explain the distance between the plan and reality, which is usually the moment marketing takes the hit. Pipeline's light, CAC is climbing, growth is behind, and "marketing isn't working" becomes the easy answer. So the company swaps channels, agencies, messaging, and marketing leaders, sometimes all four, without ever touching the thing that was actually holding growth back.

None of this means marketing sits on its hands waiting for fit to show up on its own. I'd argue the opposite, that marketing is one of the most useful functions a pre-PMF company has, as long as everyone's honest about what the job is.

You become the clearest voice of the market inside the building. You talk to more of it than anyone else does, you watch which messages land and which ones die, you hear the objections in real time, you see which segment leans in. All of that has to flow back into product, sales, positioning, and the ICP, because at this stage marketing is a fit-finding function at least as much as a growth one.

You also work the positioning constantly, because a real share of what gets called "no PMF" is really "no clarity." I've watched companies conclude the product was broken when the actual problem was that the market couldn't tell what it was or who it was for. Fixing that is squarely in marketing's hands, and it's frequently the highest-leverage thing you can do all year.

At the same time, you go capture whatever demand does exist. Even before broad fit, there's often a narrow segment where the product genuinely lands, some high-intent search, competitor traffic, a use case where buyers get it immediately. Chase that. You're not going to bend it into a hockey stick, but you'll build real pipeline while you learn the things that matter most: who actually buys, why, what language moves them, and where the product pulls hardest.

That learning is progress in its own right. A tightening ICP, positioning that's landing cleaner, win rates climbing in one segment, repeatable reasons people say yes, those are real signs the company is moving toward something it can eventually scale, even when the top-line chart hasn't caught up yet.

It's joining one where everyone in the room assumes your job is growth.

If the fit is there, you're taking a growth job, and the work is to capture demand, generate more of it, build the engine, and scale what already works. If it isn't, you're taking a find-fit job, and the work is to help the company read the market, tighten the ICP and positioning, capture the real demand that exists, and figure out what can actually be scaled later. Both can be good jobs. Both can move your career forward. But they are not the same job, and they should never carry the same expectations.

The mistake, the one that burns budget and runway and usually the marketer along with them, is treating a find-fit job like a growth job and spending harder to force a response the market isn't ready to give. So before you take the role, do the diagnosis. Figure out which job you're actually being hired to do, and make sure the founders understand the difference too, because you'll both be a lot happier a year from now if you agreed on the assignment before you started.

Would you take a pre-PMF marketing role if you knew exactly what you were walking into? Reply and tell me. I read every one.

Most GTM teams watch two numbers, pipeline created and closed-won, and miss almost everything in between. That's where a lot of revenue leaks out: the no-decision losses, the stalled deals, the discounting nobody tracks, the opportunities that stop moving without anyone noticing until the quarter's already slipping.

On September 22, Eric Gruber of PersonalABM and I are kicking off Beyond the Pipeline, a three-part LinkedIn Live series digging into where revenue actually gets stuck once opportunities enter the pipeline. In Part 1, we'll walk through the early findings from the GTM research MarketingHQ and PersonalABM have been running, and a few of the numbers genuinely surprised us. Come with your questions. We'd rather this be a real conversation than another webinar.

📅 Tuesday, September 22 at 11:00 AM ET

We're sending all attendees the full findings report after the session!

These are the kinds of conversations happening every day inside MarketingHQ. Less about running another campaign, more about how the whole GTM system actually fits together: the handoffs, the sequencing, and the parts that fall between teams because nobody clearly owns them.

If that's the kind of conversation you're looking for, come join us. Inside the community, you'll get:

Startup & B2B SaaS leadership

CMO, Early-Stage Startup at Stealth Startup (Remote, Dallas)

Chief Marketing Officer, B2B SaaS at Supreme Talent ($225K+)

Chief Marketing Officer at Neural Concept (Jersey City, NJ)

Chief Marketing Officer at Secure Engage (Remote, OR)

Chief Marketing Officer at Stayd Collective (Remote, NY)

VP, Growth Marketing at net2phone (Newark, NJ / $200K–$225K)

CMO, Customer Acquisition at Uncover (Remote, NY)

Senior roles (where startup marketers go up-market)

VP, Product Marketing at Seismic (Remote / $215K+)

Director, Product Marketing at Axcelis Technologies (Beverly, MA / $163K–$245K)

VP, Head of Marketing at The American College of Financial Services (King of Prussia, PA / $185K–$210K)

VP of Marketing at Elite Consulting Partners (Mount Laurel, NJ / $135K–$150K)

VP, Client Marketing at Synchrony (Baltimore, MD / $110K–$185K)

Product marketing, ops & growth

Marketing Operations Manager at Cockroach Labs (New York, NY)

Marketing Operations & Analytics Lead at Copyleaks (New York, NY)

Digital Marketing Manager, Web Strategy / Demand Center at AWS (New York, NY)

Growth Marketing Manager, Paid Acquisition at BookBub (MA / $80K–$115K)

Senior Manager, Marketing Operations at Cornerstone OnDemand (Remote, NY)

Find many more roles on our MarketingHQ Job Board

Stop losing deals you should be winning.

Bad leads. Slow deals. Objections you didn't see coming.

That's not a sales problem. You're selling to the wrong people.

Most founders never stop to define exactly who their product is actually for. So they pitch everyone, convert few, and wonder why the funnel's broken.

HubSpot for Startups built a free tool that fixes the root cause in 2 minutes. Paste your URL, answer a few quick questions, and get a clear profile of your best-fit customer.

Build Your Free ICP.

If this email was forwarded to you, sign up here to get our weekly newsletter directly in your inbox.